Migrate entities from another platform into existing base44 app
Another “extension” to the current “Migrate from another platform” → migrate entities from another platform to an EXISTING base44 app. E.g. - migrate entities from WooCommerce into my base44 app.

Omri Nathanson 13 days ago
Migrate entities from another platform into existing base44 app
Another “extension” to the current “Migrate from another platform” → migrate entities from another platform to an EXISTING base44 app. E.g. - migrate entities from WooCommerce into my base44 app.

Omri Nathanson 13 days ago
Invitation e-mail subsystem - SDK suggestions
Expose invitation status on the User entity: Add an "invitation_status" or "is_pending" field to the User entity that reflects whether the user has actually logged in / completed registration after being invited. Separate invitation list endpoint: Provide a base44.users.listInvitations() SDK method (or similar) that returns all pending invitations with metadata (email, role, invited_at, invited_by). Webhook / entity event on user acceptance: Fire an entity event (or automation trigger) when an invited user completes sign-up, so apps can react (e.g., auto-delete a PendingInvite record, send a welcome message). Cancel invitation API: Provide a base44.users.cancelInvitation(email) method so developers do not need to manage cancellation state manually in a separate entity. Allow SendEmail to non-registered users (opt-in): Currently, the Core SendEmail integration silently blocks or rejects emails to addresses that are not registered app users. This prevents apps from sending custom invitation emails, onboarding sequences, or pre-registration communications. Suggestion: provide an opt-in flag (e.g. allow_external: true) that permits sending to any email address, with appropriate security review / rate limiting. These additions would eliminate the need for workarounds and make user invitation management a first-class, reliable feature of the platform.

Veneris Solar Energy 21 days ago
Invitation e-mail subsystem - SDK suggestions
Expose invitation status on the User entity: Add an "invitation_status" or "is_pending" field to the User entity that reflects whether the user has actually logged in / completed registration after being invited. Separate invitation list endpoint: Provide a base44.users.listInvitations() SDK method (or similar) that returns all pending invitations with metadata (email, role, invited_at, invited_by). Webhook / entity event on user acceptance: Fire an entity event (or automation trigger) when an invited user completes sign-up, so apps can react (e.g., auto-delete a PendingInvite record, send a welcome message). Cancel invitation API: Provide a base44.users.cancelInvitation(email) method so developers do not need to manage cancellation state manually in a separate entity. Allow SendEmail to non-registered users (opt-in): Currently, the Core SendEmail integration silently blocks or rejects emails to addresses that are not registered app users. This prevents apps from sending custom invitation emails, onboarding sequences, or pre-registration communications. Suggestion: provide an opt-in flag (e.g. allow_external: true) that permits sending to any email address, with appropriate security review / rate limiting. These additions would eliminate the need for workarounds and make user invitation management a first-class, reliable feature of the platform.

Veneris Solar Energy 21 days ago
Dynamic credit billing by users usage ..
It would be nice to be able scale credits by usage of all users on app.. like Sometimes they can consume 200 K and some month they can use all of them combined more then 500K or 1mil….. ?

Petr Jelen 27 days ago
Dynamic credit billing by users usage ..
It would be nice to be able scale credits by usage of all users on app.. like Sometimes they can consume 200 K and some month they can use all of them combined more then 500K or 1mil….. ?

Petr Jelen 27 days ago
in app PURCHASES!!! its a must!!
Hi, I'm building an iOS app with Base44 and it got rejected by Apple because of Guideline 3.1.1 — they require In-App Purchase (StoreKit) instead of Stripe for digital content. Do you have a native StoreKit / In-App Purchase integration planned? If so, when will it be available?

Shady about 1 month ago
in app PURCHASES!!! its a must!!
Hi, I'm building an iOS app with Base44 and it got rejected by Apple because of Guideline 3.1.1 — they require In-App Purchase (StoreKit) instead of Stripe for digital content. Do you have a native StoreKit / In-App Purchase integration planned? If so, when will it be available?

Shady about 1 month ago
Payment- Revolut
Guys can we get an api integration for Revolut this way we can simply connect and charge payments. Thanks, if you agree up vote

Rafi about 1 month ago
Payment- Revolut
Guys can we get an api integration for Revolut this way we can simply connect and charge payments. Thanks, if you agree up vote

Rafi about 1 month ago
App addon native
Add native functions so you can get better app such as pay on app (Apple Pay), push notifications, Touch ID, Face ID and more authentication thanks

Rafi about 1 month ago
App addon native
Add native functions so you can get better app such as pay on app (Apple Pay), push notifications, Touch ID, Face ID and more authentication thanks

Rafi about 1 month ago
Addsense
Please offer free Google AdSense integration. I would also like you offer some free integration to people who don't have a budget.

I Want Novelties about 1 month ago
Addsense
Please offer free Google AdSense integration. I would also like you offer some free integration to people who don't have a budget.

I Want Novelties about 1 month ago
I would need we can connect to Google Maps
I am building share riding app and would love if we can connect to Google map and Google Place

Askar DG KAMIS (IDHotelier) about 2 months ago
I would need we can connect to Google Maps
I am building share riding app and would love if we can connect to Google map and Google Place

Askar DG KAMIS (IDHotelier) about 2 months ago
Add a reference abilities
When I want to build a game or app similar to another, I want this builder to be able to pull refewrences from the internet to use as a guide for what im looking for

merry jane about 2 months ago
Add a reference abilities
When I want to build a game or app similar to another, I want this builder to be able to pull refewrences from the internet to use as a guide for what im looking for

merry jane about 2 months ago
Google Drive blocked — "This app is blocked" when trying to connect
Hi! I'm trying to connect Google Drive to my Superagent on Base44, but when I click "Connect" and get redirected to Google's authentication page, I receive the following error: "This app is blocked — This app tried to access sensitive info in your Google Account. To keep your account safe, Google blocked access." I tried both on mobile and desktop, across different browsers, and the error persists. All other Google integrations (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Tasks, and Meet) connected successfully — the issue is specific to Google Drive. I tried both on mobile and desktop, across different browsers, and the error persists. All other Google integrations (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Tasks, and Meet) connected successfully — the issue is specific to Google Drive. Thank you!

Jean Gomes about 2 months ago
Google Drive blocked — "This app is blocked" when trying to connect
Hi! I'm trying to connect Google Drive to my Superagent on Base44, but when I click "Connect" and get redirected to Google's authentication page, I receive the following error: "This app is blocked — This app tried to access sensitive info in your Google Account. To keep your account safe, Google blocked access." I tried both on mobile and desktop, across different browsers, and the error persists. All other Google integrations (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Tasks, and Meet) connected successfully — the issue is specific to Google Drive. I tried both on mobile and desktop, across different browsers, and the error persists. All other Google integrations (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Tasks, and Meet) connected successfully — the issue is specific to Google Drive. Thank you!

Jean Gomes about 2 months ago
New idea
Look my idea for base44 is like now there is like a page with partners.What if base44 make like a page where you can post your ad and say how mich he pays and you can send your website and the ad giver says yes or no

Tom 2 months ago
New idea
Look my idea for base44 is like now there is like a page with partners.What if base44 make like a page where you can post your ad and say how mich he pays and you can send your website and the ad giver says yes or no

Tom 2 months ago
Push notifications
When will base44 support IOS and Android native push notifications? It is pointless to publish an app without it.

Adi Kraus 3 months ago
Push notifications
When will base44 support IOS and Android native push notifications? It is pointless to publish an app without it.

Adi Kraus 3 months ago
Greater Backend Control + Native Supabase Support for Production SaaS
We’ve been building a production SaaS platform on Base44 and overall the speed of development has been excellent. However, as we move closer to real-world deployment with multiple companies using the system, we’re encountering a few structural limitations that would benefit from deeper backend control. Key areas where additional functionality would significantly improve the platform: 1. Native Supabase Integration (Highly Needed for SaaS) For multi-tenant SaaS applications, Supabase provides mature features such as: Row Level Security (RLS) Auth management Database control Edge functions Direct support would allow developers to manage multi-company environments more reliably and securely. 2. Greater Backend Logic Control Currently many workflows rely on frontend-driven logic. In production SaaS systems we often need: Server-side functions Custom backend workflows Event-based triggers Validation that runs independently from the UI This helps ensure the system behaves correctly regardless of how the frontend is used. 3. Stronger Multi-Tenant Architecture Tools For SaaS platforms where multiple companies use the same application, developers need clearer control for: Company-level data isolation Authentication flows for new company owners vs invited team members RLS policies tied to company IDs Preventing cross-company data visibility 4. Auth Flow Flexibility Currently sign-up and access request flows are somewhat restrictive. It would help to allow: Custom onboarding flows Company creation during signup Admin approval logic customization Better handling of owner vs invited users Why this matters Base44 is extremely powerful for rapidly building SaaS products. With stronger backend and database control, it could also support more production-grade, enterprise SaaS systems, especially those using multi-tenant architectures. Would love to hear how others building SaaS on Base44 are handling these challenges as well. Thanks to the Base44 team for continuing to improve the platform.

aquo sync 3 months ago
Greater Backend Control + Native Supabase Support for Production SaaS
We’ve been building a production SaaS platform on Base44 and overall the speed of development has been excellent. However, as we move closer to real-world deployment with multiple companies using the system, we’re encountering a few structural limitations that would benefit from deeper backend control. Key areas where additional functionality would significantly improve the platform: 1. Native Supabase Integration (Highly Needed for SaaS) For multi-tenant SaaS applications, Supabase provides mature features such as: Row Level Security (RLS) Auth management Database control Edge functions Direct support would allow developers to manage multi-company environments more reliably and securely. 2. Greater Backend Logic Control Currently many workflows rely on frontend-driven logic. In production SaaS systems we often need: Server-side functions Custom backend workflows Event-based triggers Validation that runs independently from the UI This helps ensure the system behaves correctly regardless of how the frontend is used. 3. Stronger Multi-Tenant Architecture Tools For SaaS platforms where multiple companies use the same application, developers need clearer control for: Company-level data isolation Authentication flows for new company owners vs invited team members RLS policies tied to company IDs Preventing cross-company data visibility 4. Auth Flow Flexibility Currently sign-up and access request flows are somewhat restrictive. It would help to allow: Custom onboarding flows Company creation during signup Admin approval logic customization Better handling of owner vs invited users Why this matters Base44 is extremely powerful for rapidly building SaaS products. With stronger backend and database control, it could also support more production-grade, enterprise SaaS systems, especially those using multi-tenant architectures. Would love to hear how others building SaaS on Base44 are handling these challenges as well. Thanks to the Base44 team for continuing to improve the platform.

aquo sync 3 months ago